A couple of days ago I read an article called Of Digital Streams, Campfires and Gardens, which discussed the differences between streams (think Twitter and Facebook) , campfires (think blogs) and gardens (think a personal wiki). The author linked to to the original piece that describes this digital garden idea in more detail: The Garden and the Stream: A Technopastoral
I read that piece this morning and it got me excited about the idea of federated/decentralised wikis again. Not only should we be keeping our own personal wikis (or topic journals as Derek Sivers calls them), but we should attempt to integrate them.
So what's the use of a personal wiki, or digital garden?
And when you get to that point, where you’ve mapped out 1000s of articles of your own knowledge you start to see impacts on your thought that are very hard to describe.
And how is this different from the streams and campfires?
I am going to make the argument that the predominant form of the social web — that amalgam of blogging, Twitter, Facebook, forums, Reddit, Instagram — is an impoverished model for learning and research and that our survival as a species depends on us getting past the sweet, salty fat of “the web as conversation” and on to something more timeless, integrative, iterative, something less personal and less self-assertive, something more solitary yet more connected.
Isn't this what Wikipedia is?
People say, well yes, but Wikipedia! Look at Wikipedia!
Yes, let’s talk about Wikipedia. There’s a billion people posting what they think about crap on Facebook.
There’s about 31,000 active wikipedians that hold English Wikipedia together. That’s about the population of Stanford University, students, faculty and staff combined, for the entire English speaking world.
I'll leave you with an example of a decentralised wiki that is being created by the the XXIIVV webring called simply, the Wiki.
I’m publishing this as part of 100 Days To Offload. You can join in yourself by visiting https://100daystooffload.com.
#100DaysToOffload